Been reading a bit on
bikejournal.com about different folks doing some great rides out west and east lately. There are quite a few rides that look really interesting (read:
excruciating). Which got me thinking about the main focus of all my training thus far this season... The Columbus Fall Challenge (scheduled for the last weekend in September this year). Horror stories abound about this two day
"adventure". First, not many people actually do this ride. Second, the amount of climbing is insane. Third, not many people complete this entire ride having stayed on their bikes the whole way. Fourth, the amount of climbing is insane (or had I already mentioned that?). The second point (or fourth, if you like) did not really settle into my brain until the other day when I was checking out another ride (
Ride the Rockies) which I would
dearly love to do.
Here's a quote from the Ride the Rockies web site:
The steepest sustained grade on Ride The Rockies is typically 6 to 7 percent. You can expect to climb grades of this ilk for ten uninterrupted miles. (Occasionally a route includes 15, or even 20 miles of continuous climbing.) Also occasionally, a route will include a short (i.e. 1/4 mile) stretch of road as steep as 10 percent.
This got me thinking (rare, but
always dangerous). I began to wonder how CFC stacks up in comparison to some
real mountain riding. Here is some data from the RtR site:
- Day 1: 98m - 4,700 feet of climbing
- Day 2: 44m - 700 ft.
- Day 3: 89m - 4,400 ft.
- Day 4: 36m - 2,200ft.
- Day 5: 43m - 2,800ft.
- Day 6: 61m - 5,700ft.
- Day 7: 51m - 3,700ft.
- Total: 422m - 24,200ft.
Clearly an epic mountain event! I can't wait to do this one someday. Then I read about the
Triple Bypass ride. This ride is even more epic (read:
ridiculous). During TB, one would ride over three mountain bypasses (Juniper, Loveland and Vail) and climb over 10,000 feet while riding 120 miles in one day (I
told you it was ridiculous).
Clearly one of the challenges for any rider in these mountain events is the altitude, or lack of oxygen as it were. A cycling group called
Club Hypoxia has a motto... "Oxygen or Altitude... Pick One!" Apparently you can't have both. Putting the altitude challenge aside for the moment, I started thinking about CFC again.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/912a0/912a0440d027178f51db29b5f945068ef4f086e4" alt=""
All this pondering got me searching for an e-mail that Al had sent me back in October after he did CFC 2006. It contained data regarding the 2004 CFC. At left is an elevation profile from the Sunday ride of that year (click on graph to enlarge).
On this particular day, it looks like the route was 111 miles long with just over
10,000 feet of climbing.
Al assured me the first day was just as tough. When thinking about this information in relation to what I had found about Ride the Rockies and Triple Bypass, I began to feel a little sick (in the best possible way). This "adventure" that is CFC includes 200+ miles and over 20,000 ft. of climbing in two days.
What is wrong with me??? (don't answer that)One thing is becoming clear...
The pain is coming. In the meantime, I'll continue to push and punish myself on the Five Mile Hill, Dixboro Hill, Kensington Loop and any other local hills I can find that can get my legs to burn.
(That and order a new 12-27 cassette for the rear to go with my 50-36 compact crankset.)ad augusta per angusta ~
through trial to triumph,
J